人类果然都是好争斗的 人类果然都是好争斗的！不知道大家发现没有，只要你在路上开车，经常发现车子们都挤在一起开，后面那么宽敞就是没有人肯慢一点。今天又碰到一个脑子不知道是不是缺氧的马路杀手，我开好好的，他非要超我车。然后我就不想给他超，我加速到100码，结果那家伙还是追上来了，我加到120，看前面红灯了，心想他应该不会跟我抢了，开始减速不然一准追尾。结果这二孙子一头就冲过去了，闯了半个红灯才停下。。。。。。有意思吗

新闻信息无法发布解决过程 钧 2022/9/17 10:09:10我看传递的表单都没有问题钧 2022/9/17 10:09:22但就是不响应钧 2022/9/17 10:09:47钧 2022/9/17 10:10:05钧 2022/9/17 10:14:26应该不是网络传递的问题，文件也没发现改动痕迹钧 2022/9/17 10:29:16见鬼了钧 2022/9/17 10:29:29换了个PHP版本莫名好了又钧 2022/9/17 10:29:42奇奇怪怪的钧 2022/9/17 10:30:47为啥呢？？钧 2022/9/17 10:31:30不对，应该不是PHP版本问题，因为昨天本地测试的时候也出现这个情况了钧 2022/9/17 10:34:53靠，还就是PHP版本问题

词汇学-1.5.2 1.5.2 Content Words and Functional Words 　　By notion, words can be grouped into content words and functional words. Content words denote clear notions and thus are known as notional words. They include nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs and numerals, which denote objects, phenomena, action, quality, state, degree, quantity, etc. Earth, cloud, run, walk, bright, dark, never, frequently, five, December are all content words. 　Functional words do not have notions of their own. Therefore, they are also called empty words. As their chief function is to express the relation between notions, the relation between words as well as between sentences, they are known as form words. Prepositions, conjunctions, auxiliaries and articles belong to this category.Examples are on, of, upon, and, but, do (does, did ), be (am, are, were, is), a, the and others. 　 Content words, which constitute the main body of the English vocabulary, are numerous, and the number is ever growing whereas functional words, which make up a very small number of the vocabulary, remain stable. However, functional words do far more work of expression in English on average than content words. According to Stuart Robertson, et al (1957), the nine functional words, namely, and, be, have, it, of, the, to, will, you assume one fourth of the task of expression in English. This is justified by the following examples. Of the total of twenty-seven words, only nine are content words and all the rest are functional words. [1] It is fun to play with children. [2] It is certain that they have forgotten the address. [3] The more I see the film, the more I like it.

词汇学-1.5.1 1.5 Classification of Words　　The English vocabulary consists of words of all kinds. They can be classified by different criteria and for different purposes. Words may fall into the basic word stock and nonbasic vocabulary by use frequency, into content words and functional words by notion, and into native words and borrowed words by origin..1.5.1 Basic Word Stock and Nonbasic Vocabulary　　The basic word stock is the foundation of the vocabulary accumulated over centuries and forms the common core of the language.Though words of the basic word stock constitute a small percentage of the English vocabulary, yet it is the most important part of it.These words have obvious characteristics. 　1. All national character. Words of the basic word stock denote the most common things and phenomena of the world around us, which are indispensable to all the people who speak the language. They include words relating to the following respects: Natural phenomena: rain, snow, fire, water, sun, moon, spring, summer, wind, hill;Human body and relations: head, foot, hand, face, father, mother, brother, sister, son, daughter; Names of plants and animals: oak, pine, grass, pear, apple, tree, horse, cow, sheep, cat, dog, chicken; Action, size, domain, state: come, go, eat, hear, beat,carry,good, evil, old, young, hot, cold, heavy, white,black; Numerals, pronouns, prepositions, conjunctions: one, ten, hundred, I, you, your, who, in, out, under, and, but, till,as. These words cannot be avoided by any speaker of English, irrespective of class origin, education, profession, geographical regions, culture, etc.Stability. Words of the basic word stock have been in use for centuries, e.g. man, fire, mountain, water, sun, moon. As they denote the commonest things necessary to life, they are likely to remain unchanged. Stability, however, is only relative. Actually, the basic word stock has been undergoing some changes. Words like arrow, bow, chariot, knight, which were common in the past, have now moved out of the word stock whereas such words as electricity, machine, car, plane, computer, radio, television, which denote new things and modern way of life, have entered the stock. But this change is. slow. There are many more words joining in than dropping out.Productivity. Words of the basic word stock are mostly root words or monosyllabic words. They can each be used alone, and at the same time can form new words with other roots and affixes, e.g. foot: footage, football, footpath, footer, footfall, footed, footloose, footling, footman, footing, footprint and many others. In the same way, dog is the father of doglike, doghood, dogcart, dog-cheap, dog-ear, dog-fall, dogfight, doghole, dogpaddle, dogsleep, to name just a few.Polysemy. Words belonging to the basic word stock often possess more than one meaning because most of them have undergone semantic changes in the course of use and become polysemous.One example will suffice for illustration. The verb take may mean: to move or carry from one place to another; to remove or use without permission or by mistake; to seize or capture; to get for oneself;to get hold of (something) with the hands; to be willing to accept;to bear or endure; to need (a stated amount of time); to perform the actions connected with; to test or measure; to write down; to have the intended effect or to work successfully (LDCE)Collocability. Many words of the basic word stock enter quite a number of set expressions, idiomatic usages, proverbial sayings and the like. Instances are numerous. Take heart for example: a change of heart; after one's heart; a heart of gold; at heart;break one's heart; cross one's heart; cry one's heart out; eat one's heart out ; have one's heart in one's mouth; heart and hand; heart and soul; One's heart sinks within one; take something to heart;wear one's heart upon one's sleeve; with all one's heart and so on. Of course, not all the words of the basic word stock have these characteristics. Pronouns and numerals enjoy nation-wide use and stability, but are semantically monosemous and have limited productivity and collocability.. Therefore, 'all national character' is the most important of all featurés that may differentiate words of common use from all others. Words, void of the stated characteristics, do not belong to the common core of the language. They include the following:Terminology consists of technical terms used in particular disciplines and academic areas as in medicine: photoscanning, hepatitis,indigestion,penicillin;in mathematics:algebra,trigonometry, calculus; in music: symphony, orchestra, sonata, concerto; in education: audiovisual,megauniversity,microteaching, etc.Jargon refers to the specialized vocabularies by which members of particular arts, sciences, trades and professions communicate among themselves such as in business: bottom line for 'inescapable implication, unavoidable result, ultimate version', ballpark figures for 'estimate', bargaining chips foran advantage held by any ofthe parties in a negotiation'; in horse-racing: hold him back for prevent a horse from winning', hold him in for 'force a horse to run behind at the beginning of a race so as to reserve speed for the finish'; in medicine: paranoid for 'suspicious, worried', persona hypo for 'hypodermic syringe'; in warfare: buster for 'bomb'. Generally speaking, people outside the circle have difficulty in understanding such words.formannerism'Slang belongs to the sub-standard language, a category that seems to stand between the standard general words including informal ones available to everyone and in-group words like cant (shoptalk of any sub-group), jargon, and argot, all of which are associated with, or most available to, specific groups of the population. Certain words are labeled 'slang' not because of their appearance or pronunciation but because of their usage. Dough and bread, for instance, are standard when they are used as food terms but slang in the sense of 'money'. Similarly, grass and pot have standard or formal use meaning, respectively, i. e. 'type of plant life' and “cooking utensil', but slang use meaning 'marijuana'. Such words as beaver (girl), smoky, bear (police), catch (talk to), holler (call), Roger (understand), X-rays (radar) are all' slang words (Reader's Digest 1983). The concept ' head' can be referred to by nut, dome, upper, bean, block and so on; in the same way, the meaning of 'drunk' can be expressed in as many terms as over three hundred such as elevated, merry, jolly, comfortable, boiled, grassy, tight, knocked out, blue-eyed, fried, paralyzed, pickled, stiff, stunned (Qin 1986).　　These examples indicate that much of the slang is created by changing or extending the meaning of existing words though some slang words are new coinages altogether. Slang enjoys popular use.Almost everyone uses some slang sometimes, and some people use a lot of slang often. Those who don't go to offices or seldom find themselves in formal situations, and those who spend more time with close friends than business associates and mere acquaintances, use the most slang, because slang is colourful, blunt, expressive and These examples indicate that much of the slang is created by changing or extending the meaning of existing words though some slang words are new coinages altogether. Slang enjoys popular use.Almost everyone uses some slang sometimes, and some people use a lot of slang often. Those who don't go to offices or seldom find themselves in formal situations, and those who spend more time with close friends than business associates and mere acquaintances, use the most slang, because slang is colourful, blunt, expressive and impressive. As some people claim, slang avoids pretensions. It is "language that rolls up its sleeves' and gets to work.　　4. Argot generally refers to the jargon of criminals. Its use is confined to the sub-cultural groups, and outsiders can hardly understand it, e. g. can-opener (all-purpose key), dip (pick-pocket),persuader (dagger).　　5. Dialectal words are words used only by speakers of the dialect in question. For example, beauty (AusE = excellent, great), chook (AusE = chicken), cocky (AusE = small farmer), station(AusE = ranch); auld (ScotE = old), bluid (ScotE = blood),coo (ScotE = cow), hame (ScotE = home), lough (IrE = lake),bog (IrE = swamp).　　6. Archaisms are words or forms that were once in common use but are now restricted only to specialized or limited use. They are found mainly in older poems, legal documents and religious writing or speech. Here are some examples: thou (you), ye (plural you), thee (objective you), wilt (will), brethren (brother), troth (pledge), quoth (said), aught (anything), hereof (of this, concerning this), therefrom ( from that or there), wherein (in what).　　7. Neologisms are newly-created words or expressions, or words that have taken on new meanings. Here are some examples from 12,000 WORDS:microelectronics. = the branch of electronics dealing with integrated circuitsfuturology = a study that deals with future possibilities based on current trendsAIDS = acquired immune deficiency syndromeE-mail = electronic mail, the sending of messages via computer systems internet an international computer network linking both business and private usersfreak out = withdraw from reality and society esp. by takingdrugs.

Decoupling viewed as risky bet for US 　　Economic wager driven by anti-China policies leaves no winners, experts sayThe US government's policies toward China are putting the country on the wrong track, according to China watchers who stress that a decoupling of the top two economies will harm the United States and the rest of the world.The administration of US President Joe Biden has essentially maintained the hawkish stance toward China of his predecessor, Donald Trump, in an effort to deflect criticism by blaming China for the country's economic difficulties, said George Koo, a retired international business adviser in Silicon Valley, and Cyrus Janssen, a US video blogger focusing on China, in an episode on the latter's YouTube channel."They are looking to blame somebody for all the problems that we have, that we're not fixing, and China is the most obvious target to blame, because of the economic growth that is happening in China," said Koo."One single thing that the Democratic and Republican parties can agree on is to bash China and blackmail China's image. That's a very sad thing."Koo said the US government's approach toward China is "self-destructing"."We are insisting on pushing China's head underwater, so we can still be on top," he said. "That's a losing proposition, because sooner or later, they're gonna get out from under and be on top anyway."In the meantime, we've lost all the time and opportunity to create a more competitive position for ourselves."Instead of investing in domestic development, the US government is investing in weapons and increasing the military budget in the name of "promoting democracy all around the world", said Koo.The business figure's comments struck a chord with Janssen, who lived in China for a decade."Our infrastructure just pales in comparison to what is going on in China, and how their infrastructure is developed," he said."And there's this amazing thing where you do see China's government trying to pass policies that are in the best interest of its citizens. You've seen that in its economic rise over the last 50 years," he added.Emotional' responseBy contrast, much of the US' foreign policy is "emotional-based" and "very reactionary", Janssen said. He pointed to the US' moves toward economic decoupling from China, in an effort to combat the rise of an economic competitor.Janssen, who also advises international companies, said many people are concerned about the trend toward decoupling and have asked him if all US factories will pull out of China."It's almost impossible, though certainly some industries have moved out," he said. "For example, textiles have moved to Vietnam and other countries in Southeast Asia. But we've had so many American companies that have invested tens and hundreds of millions of dollars building these factories."General Motors went to India to try to open up a vehicle plant only to find it didn't work out from the infrastructure and the logistical standpoint, said Janssen."China was just so much better. And it was so much easier to be doing business in China. So they eventually closed that plant in India and moved back to China," he said.Koo said that what the US government is asking the companies to do is like "cutting their noses off to spite the American face".Citing the last quarterly report of Lam Research, a major equipment company based in Silicon Valley, Koo said 31 percent of its business is in China and 8 percent in the US."Ostensibly, we're asking this company to stop selling to China. If you cut yourself off from the 31 percent of the business, you're really asking the company to shut down," he said.Koo said it's important for people in the US to understand that working with China is potentially an all-around win-win situation that benefits everybody, given the integration of the economies and the complementary nature of each country's skills and strengths."But to turn it into a decoupled situation is a lose-lose situation," he said. "I don't think China will benefit from a decoupled situation. But I can certainly say that the US is also going to lose on a decoupled situation."